Chinese Women Are Crying After New Divorce Law Protected Men's Assets
- JB Quinnon
- Jul 8
- 2 min read
Keyword: New Divorce Law
Chinese Women Are Crying After New Divorce Law Protected Men's Assets | The Coffee Pod
SEE VIDEO BELOW
New Divorce Law
What’s the new law?
Property division: Now, if a property is registered under one spouse’s name—even with joint mortgage payment—it remains that spouse’s in a divorce, unless the other can prove direct contributions or joint ownership facebook.com+1facebook.com+1.
Cooling-off period: China already has a 30-day waiting period before mutual divorces can be finalized, aimed at reducing impulsive splits humanrightsresearch.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1.
😢 Why are women upset?
Many women feel this shift strips away protections. Homes are traditionally in husbands’ names, and wives—especially those who stayed home—fear losing out on shared assets facebook.com+5reddit.com+5youtube.com+5.
Comparisons to “wives getting nothing” have sparked strong emotional reactions online youtube.com.
🔍 Broader implications in China
Critics warn this could make marriages financially riskier for women, potentially discouraging them from marrying or having children—contrary to the government’s goals .
Historically, China has struggled with asset division fairness. A 2011 ruling that homes bought before marriage automatically belonged to the registered buyer (often the husband) also hit women disproportionately .
⚖️ The debate around fairness
For men: Advocates argue it encourages financial responsibility—"whoever pays, owns"—and protects men's assets amid rising divorce rates.
For women: Opponents point out that domestic contributions—like child-rearing—aren’t always financially compensated, risking unfair outcomes in divorce .
🌏 Could this spread elsewhere?
Some see parallels in West—for instance, U.S. prenuptial agreements already allow individuals to modulate asset division.
However, Western legal systems typically consider non-financial contributions and may categorize property as marital even if in one name.
Comments